 |
| Dr. Lee Merritt and Mike Adams discuss the coming STAGED PLANDEMIC and the total fraud of virology and PCR “positives” |
Dec. 11, 2024
video:
source:
Health Ranger Report
https://rumble.com/c/HealthRangerReport.
For more updates, visit:
http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport
 |
| COVID SHOT NOW PROVEN TO BE MURDER - HOSPITALS PAID 1/2 MILLION DOLLARS TO KILL THE UNVACCINATED |
October 28, 2024
Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
Rail transit officials in California’s Bay Area have been ordered to pay more than $7 million to transit workers who were fired because they refused to get a COVID-19 vaccine years ago.
On Oct. 23, a federal jury in the U.S District Court for the Northern District of California sided with six former San Francisco Bay Area Regional Transit (BART) workers who had refused to get the vaccine for religious purposes.
BART was ordered to pay the group more than $7.8 million, with each individual receiving between $1.2 million and $1.5 million, the Pacific Justice Institute, which represented the transit workers in the trial, said in a statement on Oct. 24. The institute, a law firm representing the six former employees since 2022, said the eight-person jury deliberated for two days this week before returning the verdict that awarded the employees the compensation.
About a week ago, the federal jury also determined that BART had failed to prove that it suffered an undue hardship by denying accommodations to the ex-employees in the case.
On Oct. 23, the jury further found that the six employees met the burden of showing that there was a conflict between their religious beliefs and the BART vaccine mandate, which was implemented in 2021.
According to the law firm, the jury also agreed with the figures that the plaintiffs had provided for lost wages that they had suffered after losing their jobs. The jury then added $1 million each to those figures, the firm said, describing the verdict as a “legal earthquake.”
“The rail employees chose to lose their livelihood rather than deny their faith. That in itself shows the sincerity and depth of their convictions,“ Kevin Snider, the Pacific Justice Institute’s chief counsel, who served as lead trial attorney, said. ”After nearly three years of struggle, these essential workers feel they were heard and understood by the jury and are overjoyed and relieved by the verdict.”
The law firm stated: “During the trial, jurors heard compelling testimony from dedicated employees. One of the plaintiffs had worked for more than 30 years for BART, with a stretch of 10 years perfect attendance, before being unceremoniously dismissed. Another had been out on workers comp for months, with no scheduled return date, when she was fired.”
Lawyers for BART argued that multiple employees who had conflicts with receiving the vaccine had secular—rather than religious—reasons. But the jury disagreed with those arguments, the Pacific Justice Institute said.
The vaccine mandate was approved by BART’s board of directors in October 2021 and stipulated that all employees must get the COVID-19 vaccine. It allowed some employees to be exempt from the vaccine, including for religious reasons.
A year later, BART employees filed a class-action lawsuit accusing the operator of denying religious accommodations that violated state law.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who presided over the lawsuit against BART, ruled that the operator’s policies did not violate the employees’ right to religious freedom, according to an order he issued in March.
A separate order issued by Alsup in January found that BART received 188 requests for a religious exemption and accommodation, and of that figure, 40 chose not to complete the process. They were either terminated from employment or ultimately got the vaccine.
“Plaintiffs’ putative class fails because its members have little in common beyond their request for religious accommodation,” the judge further said in his order. “They do not share a common religious objection. They do not share a vocation or a set of contractual rights. They do not present a similar set of potential accommodations and associated burdens. They do not present similar health and exposure concerns.
“Potential accommodations do not impact the same pool of coworkers. Those coworkers do not have the same bargained-for rights.”
The Epoch Times contacted BART for comment on Oct. 25 but received no reply by publication time. The rail operator’s spokesman, James Allison, told local news outlet SFGate that it had “no comment” on the verdict.
Source: ZeroHedge
Image: Brownstone Institute
October 18, 2024
By Neenah Payne
The FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization in December 2020 to authorize Pfizer to provide mRNA shots for COVID-19 in the US. However, EUAs are legal only if no effective treatment is available. Yet, Senate Hearings Show COVID-19 Vaccine Use Illegal explained that several early outpatient treatments including HCQ, Ivermectin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, and budesonide were known in early 2020.
Pfizer Enters Largest Healthcare Fraud Settlement in U.S. History shows that Pfizer, inc., paid $2.3 billion to the Federal government and 49 States to settle allegations it violated federal regulations in promoting several drugs.
Pfizer drug breach ends in biggest US crime fine reported on September 2, 2009:
Pfizer, the world’s largest drugs company, has been hit with the biggest criminal fine in US history as part of a $2.3bn settlement with federal prosecutors for mispromoting medicines and for paying kickbacks to compliant doctors. In a blow to its reputation in the eyes of doctors and patients, Pfizer pleaded guilty to misbranding the painkiller Bextra, withdrawn from the market in 2004, by promoting the drug for uses that were not approved by medical regulators. The New York-based company also settled civil allegations concerning improper payments to doctors who prescribed nine other pharmaceutical products, although it continues to deny these charges.
Pfizer: six scandals to remember 4/22/21
Pfizer is likely to make huge profits from its COVID-19 vaccine but the greatest long-term benefit to the company may well be the positive PR it has received as a result. That PR was much-needed: before COVID-19, Pfizer had a toxic reputation even compared to other pharma companies. In the latest part of our ‘Vaccine Capitalism’ series, we remember why, with six of its biggest scandals. For a longer list read reports from US organisations Corp-Research, Good Jobs First and Drugwatch.
The United States and New Zealand are the only nations that allow drug companies to advertise on television. So, many programs in America are now “brought to you by Pfizer”.
‘Brought To You By Pfizer’: These Are News Programs That Are Sponsored By Big Pharma
While the US continues to assure the public that the COVID shots are “safe and effective” even for pregnant women and six-month-old babies, a slideshow at the FDA in October 2020 warned twice that the shots could cause multiple serious illnesses and death!
by Adan Salazar July 30th 2021
An FDA slideshow presentation regarding Covid vaccines last year accidentally displayed a long list of possible adverse reactions to the vaccine, including myocarditis, seizures and even death. The slide, showing the FDA’s draft list of “possible adverse event outcomes,” appeared briefly [at 2:33:40] during a public meeting by the US Food and Drug Administration’s Product Advisory Committee on Oct, 22, 2020 reviewing the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines.
While adverse events were generally discussed throughout the meeting, the slide’s contents were not covered in-depth. The meeting came as the FDA was considering granting emergency use authorization to Pfizer and Biontech’s experimental jab. Despite the long list of known possible side effects, the FDA later granted Pfizer emergency use authorization on December 11, 2020, about two months after the meeting.
During the same meeting, a similar list of adverse reactions also appeared briefly during deputy director of the Immunization Safety Office at the CDC Tom Shimabukuro’s presentation (at around 2:06:29).
Although Pfizer had promised transparency about the COVID-19 vaccine, it tried to hide its clinical trial data on the COVID shot for 75 years! However, attorney Aaron Siri, Managing Partner of Siri & Glimstad LLP, forced the FDA to release the data in eight months starting in September 2022 as opposed to 2097! Siri’s firm works with the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) in collaboration with The Highwire, hosted by Del Bigtree, which airs online Thursdays from 2-4 ET.
Daily Wire: Judge Orders FDA To Expedite Release Of Pfizer Data On COVID-19 Vaccine (Aaron Siri) 1/7/22
Sean Hannity: A Great Win for Transparency With Aaron Siri 1/18/22
Judge scraps 75-year FDA timeline to release Pfizer vaccine safety data, giving agency eight months
Fox News: Aaron Siri on CDC Confusion and FDA Data Release (video) 1/10/22
DR. NAOMI WOLF REVEALS SHOCKING DETAILS IN “THE PFIZER PAPERS” (video)
Read more:
Shocking New Book: The Pfizer Papers
https://activistpost.com/2024/10/shocking-new-book-the-pfizer-papers.html.
