Το εύδαιμον το ελεύθερον, το δ’ ελεύθερον το εύψυχον.
– Ευτυχισμένοι είναι οι ελεύθεροι και ελεύθεροι είναι οι γενναίοι. //
// Happy are the free and free are the brave.
των ΗΠΑ από τη Συμφωνία του Παρισιού για το κλίμα ετοιμάζει το επιτελείο του Ντόναλντ Τραμπ, σύμφωνα με δημοσίευμα της αμερικανικής εφημερίδας New York Times, μετά την ίδια απόφαση που είχε λάβει κατά την πρώτη θητεία του στον Λευκό Οίκο. Επίσης το μεταβατικό επιτελείο του έχει ετοιμάσει εκτελεστικά διατάγματα και διακηρύξεις και για τη διαχείριση ορισμένων εθνικών μνημείων, ώστε να επιτρέψει περαιτέρω γεωτρήσεις και εξορύξεις.
Ο Τραμπ αναμένεται επίσης να τερματίσει την αναστολή αδειοδοτήσεων σε νέους τερματικούς σταθμούς για εξαγωγές φυσικού αερίου και να ανακαλέσει το μέτρο που επιτρέπει στην Καλιφόρνια και σε άλλες πολιτείες να υιοθετούν αυστηρότερες προδιαγραφές για τη ρύπανση, αναφέρει το δημοσίευμα.
Ορισμένα μέλη του επιτελείου εξετάζουν επίσης τη μεταφορά της έδρας της Υπηρεσίας Περιβαλλοντικής Προστασίας (EPA) εκτός Ουάσινγκτον, σύμφωνα με τους New York Times που επικαλούνται καλά πληροφορημένες πηγές.
The giant ball of fire that our planet revolves around has been far more active than scientists originally anticipated this year, and that could have very serious implications for all of us in the months ahead. Fluctuations in solar activity affect our climate more than anything else does, and we also tend to see more earthquakes when solar activity is at elevated levels. The current solar cycle is supposed to reach a peak at some point during the next 12 months, but so far there are no signs that solar activity is slowing down. In fact, the average number of sunspots that we witnessed last month was the highest that we have seen since 2001…
The average number of sunspots reached 215.5 in August, according to the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center at the Royal Observatory in Belgium. It’s the highest number since Sept.-Dec. 2001, according to SpaceWeather.com. July’s total was 196.5. Last month, NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center issued a preliminary statement that solar activity is at its highest since March 2001.
This wasn’t supposed to happen.
Scientists were originally projecting that we would see about half as many sunspots during the month of August…
Experts had predicted that August would only see half as many sunspots, indicating that the solar maximum is imminent, and it may be more active than anticipated, possibly bringing intense solar flares and coronal mass ejections.
The number of sunspots has been increasing at an exponential rate for the past couple of months.
Hopefully we will get a reprieve here in September.
Because if we don’t, we could see more severe geomagnetic storms like we did in May…
In May 2024, Earth experienced its strongest geomagnetic storm in over 20 years, with auroras visible much farther south than usual, including regions as far as Florida and Mexico. If another large sunspot appears around the time of the September equinox, it could lead to a similar or even stronger event.
When a very large geomagnetic storm occurs, it can disrupt our lives in countless ways.
Ronald Rabon, the owner of Double R Farms, said back in May when the G-5 extreme solar magnetic levels occurred, he was out spraying his cotton field when his equipment started acting up.
“I didn’t know what was wrong with it,” Rabon said. “All I knew, it was, and you could get it straightened up and go for a few minutes. And it might go 20, 30 minutes and whatever minutes from then, all of a sudden, you’d be going through the field and it might just take a left.”
Rabon said one of the biggest problems with the solar flares is preventing his sprayers from being accurate. His GPS uses precise alignments for spraying, and when knocked out of its track, could overspray his crop and kill it.
Of course if our planet is hit by a large enough storm, it could fry power grids, take down the Internet, and cause massive societal problems all over the world.
Hopefully such a scenario will not play out any time soon.
All of the solar activity that we have been witnessing is also the primary reason why there has been so much intense heat this summer…
Summer broke global heat records for the second straight year, scientists have confirmed — putting 2024 firmly on track to be the hottest year in recorded history.
The period between June and August — summer in the Northern Hemisphere — was the world’s hottest such period since records began in 1940, according to data published Friday by Copernicus, Europe’s climate change service.
Much more importantly, there tends to be a lot of seismic activity when solar activity is very high, and that is precisely what has been occurring.
As I discussed the other day, I am extremely concerned about the instability that we have been witnessing on the west coast.
This is something that I will be watching very, very closely during the months to come. In my brand new book, I explain why I believe that we have entered a time when we will see historic earthquakes of absolutely epic proportions.
Of course it isn’t just the U.S. that will be affected.
There has also been a lot of shaking south of the border lately too.
A large earth crack opened in Ejido J. Cruz Gálvez, located in the Hermosillo municipality of Sonora, Mexico, on September 6, 2024, swallowing four cows.
The crack is reported to be approximately 3 km (1.8 miles) long and 1.5 m (5 feet) wide, with a depth of 4 m (13 feet) in some sections.
According to the rancher who recorded a video of the crack, it swallowed four cows. Local authorities have not yet issued any statements regarding the matter.
It is not normal for a crack in the Earth that is 3 kilometers long to appear out of nowhere.
When will people finally start to wake up?
Our planet is becoming increasingly unstable, and this should deeply alarm all of us.
Meanwhile, the skies above our heads are becoming increasingly active as well.
For example, a giant space rock that is “approximately the size of two football fields” will come flying by our planet on September 15th…
An asteroid approximately the size of two football fields is set to make a close approach to Earth this month. According to the New York Post, the 720-foot-wide asteroid named 2024 ON, will pass around 620,000 miles from our planet on September 15. While this distance might seem vast, it’s remarkably close in astronomical terms – equivalent to just 2.6 times the distance between our planet and the Moon. However, it poses no threat to Earth.
The good news is that this particular giant space rock is definitely going to miss us.
In the future, we may not be so fortunate.
So much is happening in the skies above our heads, but most of the population is not paying attention.
Unfortunately, it is just a matter of time before major events start to happen that none of us will be able to ignore.
The "climate crisis" terrorism is a product of activists and mass media with a lot of money behind it!
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ("IPCC") reports do not define what a "climate crisis" means. The crisis that supposedly requires society to achieve zero carbon emissions or, at the very least, "net zero."
In contrast, the IPCC's latest Assessment Report ("AR6") published in 2021 points out that the corporate media's view of climate change has moved away from a neutral position by adopting and promoting terms such as "climate crisis", "global warming" and "climate emergency".
Such a statement by the IPCC should leave no doubt that the notion of an ongoing "climate crisis" is a joint product of climate activists and the click-hungry media, with no solid scientific basis, writes Aivar Usk.
So what does climate science tell us? Usk details his research on climate models, disaster scenarios and the imagined climate crisis, while giving us a reality check on what the climate records show, without the media hype. For example, "July 2023, dubbed 'Earth's hottest month on record,' may have had nearly the same number of warm and cold areas around the world compared to the time a decade earlier," he writes.
The term "climate crisis" is now a frequent feature in politicians' speeches and in the media, the "mitigation" of which is said to require society to achieve Net Zero carbon emissions.
However, in the reports of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”), the latest AR6 Assessment Report (from 2021), prepared by the Science-Based Working Group on Climate Change (“WG1”), a vol. 2,409 pages entitled " Climate Change 2021. The Science Basis ", it points out that the media's treatment of climate change has moved away from the neutral position, adopting and promoting terms such as "climate crisis", "global warming" and "climate emergency". Such a statement by the IPCC should leave no doubt that the term "climate crisis" is a joint product of left-wing climate activists and the media to terrorize the world, without any scientific basis.
The term is also absent from the European Union's 2021 climate change law, even though the European Parliament already declared a climate and environmental emergency in November 2019.
A certain small percentage of warming of our planet's climate can indeed be detected if one chooses an appropriate starting point in the time series of recent temperatures. For example, comparing the current situation to the times at the end of the Little Ice Age around 1850, or 1880, or even the coldest period between 1944 and 1976.
Estimates of warming would be even more muted if the starting point of the time series was the 1877/1878 El Niño, the tropical weather phenomenon that caused the "year without a winter " and is the warmest recorded global temperature period.
However, looking back over the millennia, the hypothesis of an unprecedented warming of our times is contradicted by the Medieval and Roman Warm Periods, not to mention the Holocene Optimum climate some 6,000 years ago.
Research over the next few years will show whether the warming recorded in 2023 was caused by a convergence of three factors, as many scientists have hypothesized: the proximity of the peak of the 25th cycle of solar activity, the strong tropical weather phenomenon El Niño, and the known record amount of water vapor injected into the stratosphere by the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai submarine volcanic eruption.
The effect of anthropogenic CO 2 was continuous and could not have caused such rapid warming. One indisputable fact seems to be that the Earth has been significantly warmer than today for most of the past 500 million years , possibly even warmer than predicted for 2100, and has not caused irreversible tipping points in the climate system.
For example, data collected by NASA's AIRS satellites and published monthly on Dr. Ole Humlum, emeritus professor of geography at the University of Oslo, show that July 2023, falsely dubbed "Earth's hottest month on record", had almost the same number of warm and cold areas around the world compared to a decade earlier. Old papers don't let us forget the extreme weather conditions of almost a century ago, which make last year's summer pale in comparison to those times.
July 2023, dubbed "Earth's hottest month on record," had nearly the same number of warm and cold places around the world compared to a decade ago, as can be seen by looking at NASA AIRS satellite data posted on Climate4you .com .
Essentially, scientists in different countries create their own climate models – the coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model AOGCM or GCM – to calculate projections of temperature, precipitation and other climate parameters, the results of which are then compared together to hopefully that the average of all representatives of the family of models can provide reliable information.
Scientists in different countries have very different views on the magnitude of the additional greenhouse effect due to carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere by human activities. Of course, the western countries that have a political agenda for the climate, present the size much larger.
There seems to be no consensus anywhere: while the Russian climate scientists who created the INM-CM4-8 model are convinced that the correct ECS is 1.8°C, the Chinese model CAMS-CSM1-0 uses 2.3° C, Norway's NorESM2-LM 2.5°C, Japan's MIROC6 uses 2.6 ºC and US NASA GISS-E2-1-G uses 2.7 ºC, while the US NCAR CESM2 model uses ECS 5, 2 ºC, the UK HadGEM3-GC35-LL ºC and the Canadian model CanESM5 uses 5.6 ºC ( McKitrick & Christy, 2020 ). There are many charlatans who would try to exploit such a confused and uncertain situation for political reasons.
In 2017, Dr. John R. Christy, a climate scientist at the University of Alabama in the US, showed to the US House Committee on Science, Space and Technology that there is a significant bias among the vast majority of representatives of the previous CMIP5 family of models, as well as on average, towards the excess warming relative to the observational data.
"Therefore, the model average is considered untrue in representing recent decades of climate variability and change, and would therefore be unsuitable for use in predicting future climate change or for related policy decisions," he concluded.
An article by Dr. Zeke Hausfather et al. in the scientific journal Nature in May 2022 warned that some of the latest climate models look "much warmer" and predict climate warming in response to higher CO 2 emissions than other evidence supports. It was also noted that already published research findings claiming that the effects of climate change will be "worse than we thought" are often attributed to CMIP6's "hot" models.
The inability to make reliable future predictions can be seen as evidence that climate modelers do not have a proper understanding of the nature of climate processes. Specifically, they are criticized for insufficiently addressing the effects of the Sun, clouds and volcanic activity.
Scientists fueling the crisis narrative generally avoid direct debate, but in the few public debates that have taken place, scientists from the climate realist camp have presented more persuasive arguments ( 2018 , 2023 ).
Dissenting voices are mostly suppressed or ignored, with activists constantly trying to label them as "paid for by the fossil fuel industry" or even "conspiracy theorists", without even qualifying as climate scientists to to have an opinion on the subject. Even a Nobel laureate in physics is unable to understand climate science and express credible critical opinions on the subject – unless he is certified by climate activists. Does this remind you of something?
Dr. Roy W. Spencer, an American climate scientist with a long-standing NASA background, compared the predictions of the latest generation of climate models with the observed history to date and found that during the period 1979-2022, global warming was projected to be averaged by CMIP6 models exceeded the balloon meteorological record by 43% and the satellite record by 75%.
After a brief review of other relevant factors, Dr. Spencer summarizes the article by stating: "Given these uncertainties, policymakers must proceed cautiously and not allow themselves to be swayed by exaggerated claims based on demonstrably flawed climate models ."
Screenwriters and Directors
I feel it appropriate to conclude with a quote from one of the official reviewers of the IPCC's third assessment report, TAR – Estonian-born professor from the University of Toronto, Olev Träss, who said in an interview with the Postimees newspaper :
“ The question is whether we should reduce carbon dioxide and put a lot of money into it – I would never do it. I am quite convinced, and I feel I am on the right track, that the effect of carbon dioxide is very small. The entire scientific community with whom we are having this discussion, even at the University of Toronto, is largely of the same opinion – we are convinced that this green agenda is really a political fraud .'
Looking at the growing number of signatures of publicly dissenting scientists on the Global Climate Declaration , it seems evident that every constitutionally democratic state must distance itself from the cult of the climate crisis, stop selectively listening to scientists and reassess the need for the climate. Abandoning utopian and costly human climate action, and leaving humanity free from motivated science and technology.
Το εύδαιμον το ελεύθερον, το δ’ ελεύθερον το εύψυχον.
– Ευτυχισμένοι είναι οι ελεύθεροι και ελεύθεροι είναι οι γενναίοι. //
// Happy are the free and free are the brave.
