 |
After 4 days of silence and no mention from the mainstream media – Pfizer responds for its director who said the company is developing ways to mutate COVID-19
The topic of the day (unfortunately only in the alternative media) is the senior Pfizer employee who said in a conversation recorded by the non-profit journalism group Project Veritas that the pharmaceutical company is creating mutations of COVID-19 in order to facilitate the development of new vaccines.
Dr. Jordan Walker, director of research and development at Pfizer, told an undercover Project Veritas reporter that scientists at Pfizer were "optimizing" the mutation process of COVID-19 for profit
Pfizer accepted the authenticity of the video
In its statement, Pfizer did not dispute that Dr. Jordan Walker, who told a Project Veritas reporter that Pfizer was researching how to "mutate" the COVID-19 virus, was or is a senior executive — unlike some media outlets that they tried to dispute that it was him!
Pfizer justified the incident by saying that it has conducted research "where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus has been used to express the spike protein from new variants of concern."
"In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for COVID-19, Pfizer has not conducted an operating profit or directed development research," Pfizer said in a lengthy written statement after four days of ignoring questions, no media reports and attempt to cover up the event by companies such as Google and Youtube!
“This work is carried out as soon as a new variant of concern is identified by public health authorities. This research provides a way to rapidly assess the ability of an existing vaccine to elicit antibodies that neutralize an identified variant of concern. We then make this data available through peer-reviewed scientific journals and use it as one of the steps to determine if a vaccine update is needed,” the company added.
Pfizer said that in its work to develop a treatment for COVID-19, it has "engineered" the COVID-19 virus "to enable assessment of antiviral activity in cells."
"Additionally, in vitro resistance selection experiments are being performed on cells incubated with SARS-CoV-2 and nirmatelvir in our secure Biosafety Level 3 (BSL3) laboratory to assess whether the primary protease can be mutated to yield resistant strains of the virus," Pfizer he said. "It is important to note that these studies are required by US and global regulatory authorities for all antiviral products and are being conducted by many companies and academic institutions in the US and around the world."
Walker's job profiles, which were subsequently removed, listed him as director of messenger RNA research at the company, the company's third-ranking executive.
What Dr. Robert Malone answered
Dr. Robert Malone, who helped develop the messenger RNA technology, said the experiments Pfizer described met the definition of "gain of function."
" Pfizer's response essentially acknowledges that they do the same type of research on operating profit that Boston University was caught doing, but they deny that it is operating profit or directed development ," Malone tweeted.
Malone pointed to Pfizer's comment about taking the original SARS-CoV-2 virus and using it "to express the spike protein from new variants of concern."
“Gain of function” generally describes experiments aimed at increasing the functions of a virus such as its transmissibility and virulence.
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) is supposed to oversee dangerous research conducted or funded by the United States, but it has been doing so since 2019 – under the oversight system!
YouTube removes videos that Pfizer identified as authentic!
In a notice sent to Project Veritas, the Google-owned YouTube that also deleted Walker's data, it cited its medical misinformation policy , which excludes "claims about the COVID-19 vaccination that contradict the expert consensus from local health authorities or the World Health Organization (WHO).
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times that the part of the video with O'Keefe stating that Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccines "are ineffective against variants of the virus" violates the policy.
Project Veritas' response
“ For a reporter to ask a leading question, do they remove a video? They say you can't even ask a question? How are journalists supposed to investigate powerful pharmaceutical companies when Big Tech censors questions the public wants answered? A Project Veritas spokesperson told The Epoch Times.
Project Veritas received a “penalty,” which prevents the organization from doing things like uploading new videos for a week. A second warning would prevent such actions for two weeks, and a third warning within a 90-day period would result in the group's account being permanently removed, YouTube warned.
The video is still available on Twitter and Rumble.
Rumble said the company "will hold the line against this outrageous censorship by keeping the video and even showing it on their homepage ."
After the Project Veritas video was first published, a Google search showed a message that "the results below change quickly" and that "if this topic is new, it can sometimes take time for them to publish information from reliable sources." . In addition, Walker's LinkedIn information disappeared during his search. While on DuckDuckGo, the deleted LinkedIn profile was still a top result .
Many questions
Why did YouTube and Google try to erase the details of the company's CEO, in a video that was finally accepted as authentic by the company itself?
Why didn't the company respond immediately and did so only after 4 days?
Why was there an initiative to cover up the video by the mainstream media?
Sen. Ron Johnson shared video of Walker talking about the mutation of COVID-19, and said, " It's time for Congress to thoroughly investigate vaccine manufacturers and the entire COVID vaccine approval process ."
Senator Marco Rubio had written a letter to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla addressing Walker's remarks and questioning whether the company has or plans to mutate the COVID-19 virus.
" As a leader in global public health and COVID vaccine development, with American taxpayer dollars, it is critical that Pfizer be accountable for its actions and be transparent with the public about the substance and intent of the research." her ," Rubio added.
Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, director of the Program on Bioethics and American Democracy at the Center for Ethics and Public Policy, said what Walker describes fits the definition of operating profit by making a virus more contagious and/or virulent.
" Pfizer...was potentially creating a super virus," Kheriaty said on Twitter Space. "Whether that was their intention or not, it doesn't really matter. The fact that they did, and the fact that this virus would not have existed in the world without the experiments that they participated in, I think that is the decisive point .'
Editor's Comment : Pfizer appears to be acting like a criminal organization against public health for profit. The answer she gave is a cheap excuse and does not cover anyone, she should be examined for her suspicious role after the confession of her third-in-line senior executive in the company's hierarchy.
The major online platforms should also apologize for trying to hide the event from the general public. We must stop them at all costs. Humanity is in danger from them!
With information from The Epoch Times
source
You will find us on Twitter
You will find us on Twitter
