Κρήτη – Νεκρή ανασύρθηκε από τη θάλασσα 30χρονη

 

Κρήτη – Νεκρή ανασύρθηκε από 

τη θάλασσα 30χρονη


Νεκρή βρέθηκε 30χρονη Γαλλίδα η οποία έκανε διακοπές στην Κρήτη.

Συγκεκριμένα, σύμφωνα με το ekriti, η άτυχη γυναίκα που έκανε διακοπές μαζί με την αδελφή της στο Μπαλί Ρεθύμνου, εντόπισε ο ναυαγοσώστης μέσα στην θάλασσα και κατάλαβε ότι κάτι της συνέβη. Ο ίδιος βούτηξε και την έβγαλε στην στεριά.

Στο σημείο επικράτησε αναστάτωση. Άμεσα κλήθηκε ασθενοφόρο του ΕΚΑΒ και αφού τις έδωσαν τις πρώτες βοήθειες το πλήρωμα την παρέλαβε και την μετέφερε στο νοσοκομείο Ρεθύμνου, ωστόσο δυστυχώς η άτυχη γυναίκα είχε ήδη καταλήξει.

Φως στα ακριβή αίτια του θανάτου της άτυχης Γαλλίδας θα ρίξει η νεκροψία νεκροτομή, που θα διενεργηθεί, ενώ την προανάκριση θα κάνει το Λιμεναρχείο Ρεθύμνου.

nassosblog.gr

BREAKING POINT for America: Steve Quayle and Mike Adams warn of the coming nullification, secession and CIVIL WAR



BREAKING POINT for America: Steve Quayle and Mike Adams warn of the coming nullification, secession and CIVIL WAR


Published August 11, 2022


video :

https://rumble.com/v1fnz1b-breaking-point-for-america-steve-quayle-and-mike-adams-warn-of-the-coming-n.html


source :

You are 25X More Likely to be Injured and 20X more Likely to Die if you get the COVID Shot



You are 25X More Likely to be Injured and 20X more Likely to Die if you get the COVID Shot


Comments by Brian Shilhavy

Editor, Health Impact News

The biggest lie that has been perpetrated in modern medicine is that “the science is settled” when it comes to the issue of vaccines, and that all vaccines are “safe and effective.”

We have been exposing this lie for over a decade now, combating the lies with REAL data and truth, such as comparing the health outcomes of children whose parents followed the CDC vaccine schedule and injected their children with all the recommended vaccines, with those parents who decided to not vaccinate their children.

This is, by far, the most scientific way to determine if vaccines, ANY vaccine, is “safe and effective.” But such studies have never been conducted by the federal government and their alphabet “health” agencies such as the FDA, CDC, NIH, etc.

And when others privately conduct such studies, these federal bureaucratic medical tyrants do everything they can to discredit and vilify those conducting such studies, to prevent the public from having this information.

Here are some previous articles we have published on this topic:

Study: Unvaccinated Children Healthier Than Vaccinated Kids – Doctors Agree

Studies Outside the U.S. Show Unvaccinated Children Healthier than Vaccinated Children

Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker?

Families who suffer from vaccine injuries to their children, and as a result then decide to not vaccinate future children that they have, also become homes in which the health outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children can be observed.

Banned Videos of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children Restored on Health Impact News

So it should not surprise us at all that the current medical authorities have no desire whatsoever to compare the health outcomes of people who have been vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccines with those who have not.

This is information that they do NOT want to be disseminated to the public.

Steve Kirsch has just published a very revealing article about two groups of people he has studied that contain both people vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines and those who were not, comprising a sample of about 800 people, 200 of which attended a wedding about 8 months ago, and about 600 people who responded to a survey he published.

The results of his analysis:

In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”

  • you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die
  • expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death

It is this kind of data the CDC and FDA do NOT want disseminated to the public, and is being heavily censored.

You are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die if you get the COVID shot

When you combine this result with negative vaccine efficacy, the COVID shots are completely nonsensical. Nobody should take them. We couldn’t find a single supportive anecdote!

by Steve Kirsch
Substack

Executive summary

I recently learned about conservative radio show host Wayne Root’s stunning anecdotal evidence about the 200 people who attended his wedding. He tracked what happened just 8 months after the wedding: 26 were injured and 7 died in the vaccinated group but nothing happened to people in the unvaccinated group, even though Wayne estimated that most of the guests were unvaccinated.

I loved the setup: it’s an almost “as good as it gets real-life randomized trial.”

A single anecdote isn’t compelling. What is compelling is that others are observing the same huge event rates. Wayne is hardly an outlier. And the fact we can’t seem to find any stories equally extreme on the opposite side has got to be very troubling for those supporting the “safe and effective” narrative.

This is the type of post-marketing research the CDC should be doing: they should follow matched (or randomly selected) groups of vaxxed and unvaxxed people over time to document injuries and deaths just like Wayne did. If Wayne can do this, why can’t the CDC? The signal is huge.

Since none of Wayne’s friends died pre-vaccine (Wayne is 61), this suggests that hypotheses such as this one are consistent with what Wayne observed:

In the year after you are vaccinated with the COVID “vaccines”

  • you are 25X more likely to be injured and 20X more likely to die
  • expect at least a 7% rate of serious injury and a 2% chance of death

would be consistent with Wayne’s observations.

I validated that Wayne’s numbers weren’t just a fluke with surveys of my reader base. Over 600 readers responded and the numbers were very similar: 21 injuries and 5 deaths per 100 vaccinated, which is very close to the numbers reported by Wayne (assuming he had an even mix of vaxxed/unvaxxed guests).

An article on The Expose just claimed that 1 in every 246 Vaccinated People has died within 60 days of Covid-19 Vaccination in England according to the UK Government which is a factor of 5 lower than my hypothesis, but that’s just limited to the first 60 days after a single dose.

And then I went even further looking for anecdotal evidence that Wayne was wrong. I asked my 50,000 followers on Gab for opposite anecdotes. None of the 372 people had an anecdote supporting use of the vaccine. Stunning.

When you combine this with the evidence of negative vaccine efficacy (VE), such as this article on San Diego by my good friend Mathew Crawford, we are left with the inevitable conclusion that there isn’t any benefit at all in any dimension to support the use of the COVID “vaccines.”

I invite all fact checkers to:

  1. Verify my data. The survey data, including the full contact info for each of the 600 respondents, is available for any fact checker to verify.
  2. Do their own survey. Mine was done in full public view.
  3. Explain why nobody I asked knew of any positive anecdotes.

When you combine all of this with the fact that

The COVID vaccines kill people at a rate that is 1,000X times higher than the Smallpox vaccine (which is deemed too unsafe to use),

it is hard to come to any conclusion other than that the “vaccines” should be stopped immediately.

Read the full article here.


or Here

 source

Dirtbag Alert… AG Garland Threatens Americans Who Attack “Integrity of FBI” — Basically Admits THEY GOT NOTHING in the Raid (VIDEO)

 

Dirtbag Alert… AG Garland Threatens Americans Who Attack “Integrity of FBI” — Basically Admits THEY GOT NOTHING in the Raid (VIDEO)


By Jim Hoft
Published August 11, 2022 at 2:28pm


Attorney General Merrick Garland delivered remarks at 2:30 3:04 PM Eastern on the unprecedented raid on President Donald Trump’s home.

Garland has not commented on the raid up to this point.

On Monday at least 30 FBI agents and 3 DOJ officials raided Mar-a-Lago in their continued fishing expedition to manufacture a crime against the 45th President.

Garland today basically admitted they have nothing on President Trump. He could not identify ANYTHING the president did that was illegal.

TRENDING: Announcement: The Gateway Pundit's Jim Hoft Elevated to Lead Plaintiff in State of Missouri and State of Louisiana Lawsuit vs. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. et al.

This confirms that the 9 hour raid on President Trump’s home was a fishing expedition — or they were after documents that indict the FBI.

Merrick Garland today promised he will not stand by as Americans verbally attack the Stasi-FBI.

AG Merrick Garland: “I will not stand by silently when integrity of DOJ and FBI is unfairly attacked.”

Spoken like a true communist.

God help us.

video :

https://rumble.com/v1fngmp-ag-garland-i-will-not-stand-by-silently-when-integrity-of-fbi-and-doj-is-un.html


source   


Repression, Terror, Fear: The Government Wants to Silence the Opposition

“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” — President Harry S. Truman

Repression, Terror, Fear: The Government Wants to Silence the Opposition


written by john w. whitehead 

& nisha whitehead

wednesday august 10, 2022


Militarized police. Riot squads. Camouflage gear. Black uniforms. Armored vehicles. Mass arrests. Pepper spray. Tear gas. Batons. Strip searches. Surveillance cameras. Kevlar vests. Drones. Lethal weapons. Less-than-lethal weapons unleashed with deadly force. Rubber bullets. Water cannons. Stun grenades. Arrests of journalists. Crowd control tactics. Intimidation tactics. Brutality. Lockdowns.


This is not the language of freedom. This is not even the language of law and order.

This is the language of force.

This is how the government at all levels—federal, state and local—now responds to those who speak out against government corruption, misconduct and abuse.

These overreaching, heavy-handed lessons in how to rule by force have become standard operating procedure for a government that communicates with its citizenry primarily through the language of brutality, intimidation and fear.

We didn’t know it then, but what happened five years ago in Charlottesville, Va., was a foretaste of what was to come.

At the time, Charlottesville was at the center of a growing struggle over how to reconcile the right to think and speak freely, especially about controversial ideas, with the push to sanitize the environment of anything—words and images—that might cause offense. That fear of offense prompted the Charlottesville City Council to get rid of a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee that had graced one of its public parks for 82 years.

In attempting to err on the side of political correctness by placating one group while muzzling critics of the city’s actions, Charlottesville attracted the unwanted attention of the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis and the alt-Right, all of whom descended on the little college town with the intention of exercising their First Amendment right to be disagreeable, to assemble, and to protest.

That’s when everything went haywire.

When put to the test, Charlottesville did not handle things well at all.

On August 12, 2017, government officials took what should have been a legitimate exercise in constitutional principles (free speech, assembly and protest) and turned it into a lesson in authoritarianism by manipulating warring factions and engineering events in such a way as to foment unrest, lockdown the city, and justify further power grabs.

On the day of scheduled protests, police deliberately engineered a situation in which two opposing camps of protesters would confront each other, tensions would bubble over, and things would turn just violent enough to justify allowing the government to shut everything down.

This is not much different from what is happening on the present-day national scene.

Indeed, there’s a pattern emerging if you pay close enough attention.

Civil discontent leads to civil unrest, which leads to protests and counterprotests. Tensions rise, violence escalates, police stand down, and federal armies move in. Meanwhile, despite the protests and the outrage, the government’s abuses continue unabated.

It’s all part of an elaborate setup by the architects of the police state. The government wants a reason to crack down and lock down and bring in its biggest guns.

They want us divided. They want us to turn on one another.

They want us powerless in the face of their artillery and armed forces.

They want us silent, servile and compliant.

They certainly do not want us to remember that we have rights, let alone attempting to exercise those rights peaceably and lawfully, whether it’s protesting politically correct efforts to whitewash the past, challenging COVID-19 mandates, questioning election outcomes, or listening to alternate viewpoints—even conspiratorial ones—in order to form our own opinions about the true nature of government.

And they definitely do not want us to engage in First Amendment activities that challenge the government’s power, reveal the government’s corruption, expose the government’s lies, and encourage the citizenry to push back against the government’s many injustices.

Why else do you think Wikileaks founder Julian Assange continues to molder in jail for daring to blow the whistle about the US government’s war crimes, while government officials who rape, plunder and kill walk away with little more than a slap on the wrist?

This is how it begins.

We are moving fast down that slippery slope to an authoritarian society in which the only opinions, ideas and speech expressed are the ones permitted by the government and its corporate cohorts.

Watch and see: we are all about to become enemies of the state.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, anytime you have a government that operates in the shadows, speaks in a language of force, and rules by fiat, you’d better beware.

So what’s the answer?

For starters, we need to remember that we’ve all got rights, and we need to exercise them.

Most of all, we need to protect the rights of the people to speak truth to power, whatever that truth might be. Either “we the people” believe in free speech or we don’t.

Fifty years ago, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas asked:
Since when have we Americans been expected to bow submissively to authority and speak with awe and reverence to those who represent us? The constitutional theory is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents. We who have the final word can speak softly or angrily. We can seek to challenge and annoy, as we need not stay docile and quiet… [A]t the constitutional level, speech need not be a sedative; it can be disruptive… [A] function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger.
In other words, the Constitution does not require Americans to be servile or even civil to government officials. Neither does the Constitution require obedience (although it does insist on nonviolence).

Somehow, the government keeps overlooking this important element in the equation.

Reprinted with permission from Rutherford Institute.

source

Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity

Is the Untested and Dangerous Monkeypox Vaccine About to get an EUA to Avoid Legal Liability for Deaths and Injuries?

 

Is the Untested and Dangerous Monkeypox Vaccine About to get an EUA to Avoid Legal Liability for Deaths and Injuries?
















We saw throughout the COVID Plandemic that the pharmaceutical industry took advantage of “Public Health Emergency” designations to get the FDA to issue EUAs (emergency use authorization) to get new, untested vaccines into the market as soon as possible without proper testing, and more importantly for the pharmaceutical companies, no legal liabilities.

With the W.H.O. and the U.S. Government now declaring monkeypox to be a “Public Health Emergency,” could the same thing happen with new vaccines and drugs for monkeypox?

The problem in issuing the existing smallpox/monkeypox vaccine an EUA, is that it was already approved by the FDA, even though it has not been tested in the public much beyond the initial trials conducted by the drug company.

According to Dr. Meryl Nass, that may not stop them from figuring out a way to get the FDA to issue them an EUA to avoid legal liability:


Read More

Καλούν τον κόσμο να εμβολιαστεί κατά της πολιομυελίτιδας λόγω ανίχνευσης του ιού στα λύματα


Καλούν τον κόσμο να εμβολιαστεί κατά της 
πολιομυελίτιδας λόγω ανίχνευσης του  ιού στα λύματα


πηγη


Μετάφραση Κλαίρη Πολενάκη Πηγή anazitiseis.gr https://anazitiseis.gr/meta-tin-teras...

STEVE KIRSCH SAYS HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS HAVE BEEN KILLED BY COVID-19 VACCINES.

 





STEVE KIRSCH SAYS HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS HAVE BEEN KILLED BY COVID-19 VACCINES.






First published at 12:46 UTC on August 11th, 2022.

video :

Steve Kirsch says hundreds of thousands of Americans have been killed by COVID-19 vaccines.


source :

Truth Provider

Steve Kirsch: The most dangerous vaccine ever created by man.
Democrat megadonor explains why he's fed up
Aug. 11, 2022 - 3:23 - Steve Kirsch says hundreds of thousands of Americans have been killed by COVID-19 vaccines and speaks out against the Democratic Party on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'
Source: https://video.foxnews.com/v/6310708656112#sp=show-clips
Steve Kirsch Substack article reference: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/mainstream-media-claims-my-statements?r=o7iqo&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Reality Check: Why is housing unaffordable? Too much government

 

Reality Check: Why is housing unaffordable? Too much government




It’s almost impossible for some Canadians to afford a home right now. Government of all levels have come up with their solutions for Canada’s housing crisis. While some solutions are intriguing and some sound nice, none of them address the root problem of the issue – the government.

On this week’s episode of Reality Check, Jasmine Moulton breaks down Canada’s housing crisis and debunks the most popular leftist solutions to the crisis: government needing to implement rent control schemes, government imposing tax increases on homeowners and landlords and building more “affordable housing.”

Canadians are suffering from the worst levels of housing affordability since the 1990s according to an RBC Economics report from June. Jasmine arms you with the facts about one of our most serious and pressing issues.

Tune in now to Reality Check with Jasmine Moulton!

SUBSCRIBE TO REALITY CHECK WITH JASMINE MOULTON!




source :

Lab Leak Theory: New Evidence? (w/ Jeffery Sachs)


Lab Leak Theory: New Evidence? (w/ Jeffery Sachs)

source

Bad Faith

May 30, 2022
This week, Briahna spoke to Jeffery Sachs, who is heading the COVID-19 commission for Lancet, one of the world’s premiere scientific magazines. He once believed expert consensus that lab leak theory was a nothingburger. But as he conducted the investigation and got unsatisfactory answers about what research was happening in US labs, he became determined to prove or disprove lab leak theory — one way or another. Learn more about his muck raking investigation, new clues that indicate a zoonotic origin for COVID is less likely than a lab origin, and how he's upsetting the scientific establishment on this week’s premium Bad Faith.


POPULAR POSTS OF ALL TIME

Blog Archive

Το εύδαιμον το ελεύθερον, το δ’ ελεύθερον το εύψυχον. – Ευτυχισμένοι είναι οι ελεύθεροι και ελεύθεροι είναι οι γενναίοι. // // Happy are the free and free are the brave.